[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'
On Oct 13, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Jorge Dichenberg wrote:
--- don ohmes <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Seriously, sauropods were slow, weren't they? And if
Velociraptors could climb trees, why couldn't they
climb a startled sauropod?
Imagine a cat trying to climb a cow and kill it.
Improbable, isn't it?
If that kitty cat had claws the size of a Velociraptor, I wouldn't want
it stalking me. Ever get a Maine Coon Cat mad at you? Bad Plan! (If
you are not aware of Maine Coon Cats, do a google search and be
surprised). Attitude accounts for a lot more than physical ability
Wyoming has it's own perspective
Here in mountain lion country, I constantsly am aware of the
possibility of one jumping me when I have my head in a fossil hole (and
my back to the world) while working on a microsite. Anyone collecting
alone up here runs that small but definite risk. Mountain Lions do
take the occasional cow but usually do not survive the rancher. ( The
big cat weighs 200 + pounds and the cow weighs 1200.) Bobcats locally
take small sheep and lambs which are not too much smaller than they
are. More to the point, a small pack of 20 pound coyotes will
definitely take calves right out from under the (relatively huge)
protective angus mothers nose. (the calf is bigger than the individual
coyote and the mother is usually fairly worked up and pissy about the
predation). I would not underestimate the ability of a smaller
theropod(s) to take a larger sauropod (calf) using group warfare.
Speed, persistance and endurance would be useful in overcoming any size
difference. There is no question that the anatomy of most
Dromaeosaurids is not ideally suited for such activities but if you
look at the coyote example, you will notice some similarities in
anatomical deficiencies for such combat. Coyotes are not built ideally
for taking animals larger than themselves but they do it anyway.
Apparently, no one has told them they can't.
I think trying to bracket and limit activities of Mesozoic meat eaters
is an interesting exercise but it is wrought with problems. You can
speculate based on anatomy and be mostly correct but having said
that..... Opportunity exists and in the autistic world of a mesozoic
theropod, what you are built for and what presents itself were two
different things. I am not sure that a lot of thought went into
deciding what to eat and what not to eat. IMHO, physical intimidation
and armor were probably deciding factors of what not to eat more than a
slow huge sized fellow would typically transmit to the little
predators. Remember that there were no fast food restaurants about and
the only fast food was really fast. I think all of the theropods were
opportunistic scavengers and most of them hunted as well but the
emphasis was always on the easy meal when it was about. Tell me a
hungry fellow who was a full time hunter will ignore an easy (smelly,
pre-tenderized) snack laying about. Hunger is a motivating force for
all animals. More hungry means taking more of a chance to get a meal.
It is always a trade off for survival.
Frank (Rooster) Bliss
visit www.cattleranch.org for lots of Hell Creek fossil photos
I was simulated and looked at skeleton of
There exists a living mammal matching amlmost all
adaptations of it. It has big eyes, long skull, small
sharp teeth, carries it's head forward, has big claws
(although on foreleges, not hindlegs), long body,
shortened legs and long tail which can be pointed
vertically. It is predator, very active, lives in
groups in sandy semi-deserts.
This description fits, surprisingly, a meerkat. Small
predator adapted to running in dense vegetation,
digging and climbing. Claws are used for digging and
climbing. Even combination of shortish legs and tail
which can be pointed upwards fits - it is used by
meerkats to keep visual contact in thick vegetation.
Pack of meerkats can be fierce. But they typically
hunt animals much smaller than their size.
In contrast, Velociraptor has adaptations
contradictory to modern big predatory mammals (ones
that hunt animals bigger than themselves). Big claw is
not supported by thick leg bones needed to withstand
forces when fighting prey. Modern big cats and polar
bears have much thicker legs and jaws. Velociraptor
has thin bones and elongated skull - not suitable for
wrestling. Head facing forward makes no sense in
animal confronting prey much higher than itself. Legs
are shortened which is not a good adaptation for fast
running or jumping. Extremely long tail would be very
vulnerable to breaking or indeed, biting by prey.
In short, it was a small predator, not a big one. For
Velociraptor, peaceful Dinotopia is better than
violent Jurassic Park. ;)
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005