[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Reviews of "Sound of Thunder"

Even here in movie-land, the mere-mention of that film in it many years of pre-production has only resulted in eye-rolling. It was the film no one wanted to work on. Even dinophiles grumbled at the awful adaptation of a classic story.

 David Krentz
On Sep 1, 2005, at 7:41 AM, James Whitcraft wrote:

Since pre-production, that movie just has had a rough time making a
favorable impression, hasn't it?
At least among dinophiles...

"Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu> 09/01/05 9:05 AM >>>


There are two there, with a review of another inbetween, so scroll

One can pretty much forget about any good dinosaur bits:

 And the creatures, because they aren?t really, in the disturbingly
 vernacular of the film, dinosaurs, range from being laughably hideous
 almost ninja-like in their ability to not be seen. Most scenes are so
 dark that any reasonable CGI creation could look like the Pillsbury
 boy and still pass for a menacing dinosaur, yet these creatures move
 the ferociousness of a drugged milk cow...