[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Reviews of "Sound of Thunder"
Even here in movie-land, the mere-mention of that film in it many
years of pre-production has only resulted in eye-rolling. It was the
film no one wanted to work on. Even dinophiles grumbled at the awful
adaptation of a classic story.
On Sep 1, 2005, at 7:41 AM, James Whitcraft wrote:
Since pre-production, that movie just has had a rough time making a
favorable impression, hasn't it?
At least among dinophiles...
"Richard W. Travsky" <email@example.com> 09/01/05 9:05 AM >>>
There are two there, with a review of another inbetween, so scroll
One can pretty much forget about any good dinosaur bits:
And the creatures, because they aren?t really, in the disturbingly
vernacular of the film, dinosaurs, range from being laughably hideous
almost ninja-like in their ability to not be seen. Most scenes are so
dark that any reasonable CGI creation could look like the Pillsbury
boy and still pass for a menacing dinosaur, yet these creatures move
the ferociousness of a drugged milk cow...