[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Polytomies in cladistics: Good, Bad, or Ugly?
Phil Bigelow wrote-
In cladistics, are polytomies (3 or more branches from one node)
considered to be a valid working hypothesis, or are they instead viewed
as an artefact of a limited data set, weaknesses in the algorithm, or a
bad choice of test parameters?
I'd say they can be considered a working hypothesis in the sense they may
indicate rapid speciation events. But especially as the datasets get
smaller, they are often indicative of a need for more characters. I'd bet
someone's written a technical paper on the topic, probably in Systematic