[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: sauropods: homotherm,heterotherm or gigantotherm?

> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:25:39 +0200
> From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
> Sorry for being so frank, and for exaggerating the size of the
> problem, but, qualitatively, sending everyone everything twice is
> closer to spamming than to politeness.

The thing is, Jaime's approach (copy the person you're replying to as
well as the list) fails safe: the bad consequence of Jaime's approach
that you want to avoid (getting duplicate mails) is much less bad than
the consequence of your approach, which is that sometimes you might
not get the message at all.

 _/|_    ___________________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <mike@miketaylor.org.uk>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "More computing sins are committed in the name of efficiency
         (without necessarily achieving it) than for any other single
         reason, including blind stupidity" -- W. A. Wulf