[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Gastric stones of dinosaurs were not for milling food !
--- "Richard W. Travsky" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Dora Smith wrote:
> > I missed just one detail.
> > If the stones were not for milling food, what were
> they for?
> One article suggested it was for the mineral
> content, my thought is
> ingestion was incidental ;)
I recall an article's stating that a sauropod had
apparently choked to death on a gastrolith it was
swallowing. This would indicate that that particular
ingestion was deliberate, not incidental.