[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Oviraptorids as Parrots?

John Scanlon (riversleigh@outbackatisa.com.au) wrote:

<you're mistaken about tiger shark morphology (or confused by vernacular
taxonomy; look up Galeocerdo cuvieri); they're broad, laterally hooked and
multi-cusped sawteeth and, as was pointed out earlier, the cutting force of the
bite is provided by lateral head-shaking rather than jaw adduction.  The teeth
are similar in Cretaceous Hexanchidae except that there's a row of biggish
cusps graded in size, while one cusp dominates in Galeocerdo.>

  I appreciate Scanlon's corrections on this matter. My referrences to the
shape (semi-conical, carinate, and slender) are in direct referrence to the
form of teeth in within lamnoid sharks, from *Isurus* to *Carcharodon*,
trending from extremely narrow recurved cones to broad, bladed, thick deltoid
structures. *Galeocerdo* (which, before anyone corrects me, I know to be a
carcharhiniform, and not a lamniform, shark) appears to be intermediate in such
a cline.

  However, I do admit I was confused on the degree of flexion of the primary
cusp, though all other cusps are so much smaller as to imply they are
essentially "enlarged denticles", and thus advocated a more puncture-perfect
model based on gross tooth morphology.


Jaime A. Headden

"Innocent, unbiased observation is a myth." --- P.B. Medawar (1969)

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around