[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: A Wild Hare [not dino related]

Long answer: Recent molecular studies have thoroughly refuted the hypothesis that bats are diphyletic, with megabats closer to primates. Last I heard, molecular evidence was even indicating that Microchiroptera is actually paraphyletic with respect to Megachiroptera...

Specifically, megachiroptera come out near Rhinolophoids (if memory serves). That's additionally interesting given that Rhinolophoids have a distinct echolocation system from other microchiropterans. Since it's not dinos, I'll leave it at that. Those that would like refs on flight and echolocation differences between Rhinolophoids and other microchiropterans can contact me off-list (I have a number on hand).

1. Do eurymlids have a large diastema like Gomphos, lagomorphs and rodents do?

Not familiar with them.

I think they have some kind of diastema; mimotonids have a larger one, if I remember correctly (Mimotonids may be a lagomorph sister taxon).

Not really. Highly related to food processing; diastemata appear to have arisen many times among mammals.

True, they do pop up a lot. I've heard a few different thoughts on why diastema appear, but personally I suspect a particular pairing of mechanical advantages selects for diastema. Specifically, if an animal is combining a few teeth for snipping with a few sets of teeth for crushing, it derives significant mechanical advantage from putting the crushing teeth near the fulcrum (for high force) and the snipping teeth far from the fulcrum (for control). But that requires space between the two sets; hence a diastema. Just a thought.


--Mike Habib