[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Even more last papers for 2005



On 1/14/06, Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mickey Mortimer wrote:
> >What's more disturbing is that Senter defines Ornithosuchia in a way which
> >probably excludes Ornithosuchus, which has been noted as a flaw in this
> >definition for several years.
>
> Yes, this is the other major problem.  For Ornithosuchia, Senter has
> effectively followed Gauthier (who probably intended for _Ornithosuchus_ to
> be included in Ornithosuchia, but did not frame a definition to guarantee
> its inclusion).

Even Gauthier abandoned this name, renaming the clade _Panaves_
(Gauthier and de Queiroz, 2001). And Sereno notes online
(http://www.taxonsearch.org/dev/taxon_edit.php?Action=View&tax_id=39)
that Benton (1999) had already named this clade _Avemetatarsalia_.

Jon Wagner proposed on the PhyloCode Mailing List that Gauthier et
al.'s "Pan-" naming convention for total clades (=panstem clades) be
used not for clade names but as a sort of notational prefix. Under
this convention, "_Avemetarsalia_" and something like "pan-_Aves_"
would be equivalent expressions (essentially "heterodefinitional
synonyms"), both available for use.
--
Mike Keesey
The Dinosauricon: http://dino.lm.com
Parry & Carney: http://parryandcarney.com