[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Even more last papers for 2005
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Tim Williams <email@example.com>
> Datum: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:33:23 -0600
> It's effectively the same thing, in this case. As you say, Pseudosuchia
> was erected by Zittel to include three taxa that were superficially
> crocodilian-like, but which were *not* crocodilian. The name "false
> crocodiles" reflects this, so the etymology is an important factor since
> it captures the original intent.
In other words, the etymology was deliberate. (Probably unlike "Paraves".)
More importantly, people followed the original intent = the etymology
throughout the next century by always excluding the crocodyl...iforms at
least. In many cases it simply doesn't make sense to return to the concept
the original author had; in this one it does.
> >What's more disturbing is that Senter defines Ornithosuchia in a way
This will be forbidden by the PhyloCode, so IMHO there's no reason to
worry. (See you in Yale this summer!)
Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch?
NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie