[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The (long) future of paleontology
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:50:52 +0100 (MET)
> From: David Marjanovic <email@example.com>
>> such practically 'useless' fields as palaeontology (which will
>> never cure dieases, feed the starving, etc) that rely more on
>> satisfying human curosity than need.
> Don't you say that.
> Think of paleoclimatology. What is the world like when it is, say,
> on average 5 ÂC warmer than today? A very big part of the answer is
> to look back instead of forwards, _find_ some time in Earth history
> which was that warm, and research it. Will the deserts disappear?
> Did they disappear the last 10 times? ...
True enough ... but it's hard to see how the dinosaur work that we
all love makes any such contribution. I think Jim Farlow was bang on
target when he said "I have always prided myself on being in a field
that has no practical application."
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I started college as a physics major. It was too weird for me,
so I switched to philosophy instead" -- Bill McQuain.