[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Addendum to Trex vision as support for scavenging...
Quoting don ohmes <email@example.com>:
If my figures are correct--
Taking a Trex stride as 1.76m, assuming a stride frequency of 2
seconds (I believe 2 sec is conservative), and using Stevens' far
point of 6 km, Trex could walk to his limiting far point in ~1.9
hrs. This means that, assuming visual cues in the form of volant
scavengers were available, Trex could monitor, from a stationary
position, ~113 sq km (11340 hectares) with a two hour arrival time...
Of course, this assumes that T.rex is striding about in a completely
flat, treeless desert. :)
It would seem to me that especially acute eyesight would only be of
any use to a purely scavenging animal if it could fly. If like most of
us you're stuck crawling about on terra firma (with all it's hills,
trees, etc), then eyesight is probably not the best way to spot
carcasses - at least not directly. Watching for carrion birds (or
pterosaurs) congregating might be an exception.
If T.rex was an obligate scavenger (and that's a pretty bit 'if'),
then no doubt it's enormous nasal cavity played a larger part in
tracking down carcasses. The nose knows...
GIS / Archaeologist http://heretichides.soffiles.com
Melbourne, Australia http://www.geocities.com/dannsdinosaurs