[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Fieldwork or bust? (Was: Stenopelix valdensis)
I suppose it depends on what you mean by a "true" appreciation.
While I can see why it would be important for a /personal/ appreciation
of the fossil record, I don't see why it would be important to the
Science is an abstraction. Personal contact with it's subject may be
gratifying or inspiring, but hardly essential to good science.
Mike Taylor wrote:
Not at all wanting to get caught up in Denver and Mickey's argument,
but as I was reading a recent post in that thread, my eye was caught
by this fragment:
Denver Fowler writes:
> You cannot gain a true appreciation of time, stratigraphy,
> variation, or the fossil record as a whole, unless you actually go
> out into it and dig.
Would most other DMLers perceive this as true? What specific insight
into the fossil record can only be gained in the field and not from
studying in collections or the literature? I am genuinely curious.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not
entitled to their own facts" -- U.S. Senator Pat Moynihan.
"Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am
large, I contain multitudes." - Walt Whitman
[ Palaeo: http://palaeo.jconway.co.uk ]
[ Vector: http://nycto.jconway.co.uk ]