[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Trex size and pack-forming (was Tyrannosaur age-popula...)
The other thing this does is make a hash out of pack-forming; the
breeding pair doesn't last long enough to raise their own offspring, so
how does the pack form?
Currie, et al., still have pretty good evidence of pack behaviour in
Albertosaurs, with juveniles and sexually mature individuals in the same
Did Albertosaurs have a different growth cycle? Were tyranosaurine
sibling bonds exceptionally strong? Strong enough to work over several
years worth of siblings, so that the oldest had the help of their
younger siblings in managing to breed? Were tyrannosaurine packs
accreted on a basis of purely social bonds?
I have no idea how to answer those questions, but I sure hope someone
I agree that if one limits the concept of "pack" to the multi-generational
wolf/lion model, and assume that an altricial lifestyle is a prequisite for the
evolution of such, then the results of Erickson, et. al. (Sci. V313 7/14/06)
seem to render an evolutionary scenario resulting in packs of tyrannosaurids
improbable. Therefore, I use the more generalized term "group-hunter" here, as
tempting as the term "flock" may be.
In my opinion--
Given the large size of available prey, it is possible that tyrannosaurids
were group-hunters at least until sexual maturity. Large prey create positive
selective vectors for group-hunting; these include a big nutritional payoff,
and increased likelihood of hunting success due to small predator/prey size
ratios. These vectors could morph a basic species recognition package and a
simple 'dinner bell' scenario (where the sight/sound/smell of distressed prey
is the 'bell' attracting all local predators) into group hunting behavior, even
in the absence of first order kinship bonds.
A derived form could involve imprinting (on siblings and/or a parent) as seen
in birds, a tendency to maintain sensory contact w/ other tyrannosaurids of
similar size and age, and of course a tendency to attack prey en masse. It is
certainly possible that juveniles might have known or followed their mothers
until or even past sexual maturity, as wild turkeys do, but it is not necessary
to the formation of a group-hunter lifestyle for tyrannosaurids to have even
seen either parent.
My personal cartoon of the evolution of top predator/top herbivore as it
applies to sauropods and theropods, culminating in T. rex, is as follows--
1. To the delight of many children, proto-sauropods and proto-theropods begin
a classic predator/prey size race. As size increases, size adaptations appear,
including long skinny necks for reaching food and water, and large jaws (for
snapping necks) and tallness (for reaching them).
2. Although the theropods are small when hatched, there is a size-chain of
herbivore species for them to 'eat their way up' (as long as they stick
together), and an herbivore at the top that is large enough to support a
group-hunting lifestyle when mature.
3. Over time, the very largest prey become scarce, and the group-hunting
lifestyle is no longer economically viable when the theropods reach maturity,
leaving them stranded on an adaptive peak. Some of the top theropods respond to
this by morphing their behavioral phenotype (probably by changing sexual
behaviors) such that the group breaks up at (or somewhat before) maturity, and
mature individuals begin a lifestyle of solo (or near solo) hunting and
co-opting of fortuitous mortality. Although the prey are now somewhat smaller,
they are still quite large, and have become armed and armored (long skinny
necks are out of style, too). Further, the battle odds are now as low as
one-on-one. This combines with another positive size vector, intra-specific
competition, and results in the largest of all theropods _after_ the extinction
of the largest sauropods.
And yes, they may even have ended as the ecological equivalent of a giant
possum. Although I seriously doubt it.