[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: WAS-- Re: Hanson 2006, Mortimer, Baeker response

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:33:38 -0400 Graydon <oak@uniserve.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:46:32PM +0000, Phil Bigelow scripsit:
> > That sounds like the scientific method to me.  Tell me where I am
> > wrong.
> Math is under no obligation to correspond to the
> tangible universe. Science is.
> That both are required to be independent of any particular person's
> understanding doesn't make them the same thing in the face of that
> fundamental difference.

When I was in college, there was a guy down the hall in my dormatory that
said things like that.  He didn't go out on dates.