[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Speaking of Protoarchaeopteryx...

Yeah... Sorry. Little type-o. Caudipteryx is indeed prettier, and it helps to 
have more than one floating around out there.


In a message dated 3/28/2006 1:48:34 AM Alaskan Standard Time, 
bigelowp@juno.com writes:

Try googling using _Protarchaeopteryx_.  There is no "o" after the first

> In fact, one hardly 
> sees the animal 
> reconstructed either... Caudipteryx, on the other hand, is 
> everywhere.

Just a guess, but the Caudie type is a "prettier" specimen.  Book authors
tend to favor it for that reason.