[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Phuwiangosaurus pics?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Taylor" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Phuwiangosaurus pics?
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:01:08 +0000
> Luis Perez writes:
> > Anyone know of any Phuwiangosaurus skeletal images, or pics? I hear
> > that this sauropod from Thailand is particularly hard to place in
> > the sauropod tree [...]
> That's what was thought when it was first described. Since then,
> cladistic analysis of sauropods has come on by leaps and bounds, and
> it now seems to be fairly stably established as a basal titanosaurian
> -- e.g. Upchurch et al. 2004 (The _Dinosauria_ 2 chapter on sauropods)
> recovers it as the most basal titanosaur and therefore close to the
> brachiosaurid clade. Don't forget that a _lot_ more titanosaurs are
> known now than when _Phuwiangosaurus_ was named, so there's a lot more
> context to evaluate it in.
> /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
> )_v__/\ "I intend to live forever. So far, so good" -- Steven Wright.
>Ah, yes, then, this one would resemble something like perhaps Ligabuesaurus or
>Venenosaurus or something like that, pretty basal?
Search for products and services at: