[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Bruhathkayosaurus matleyi?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Rahul Daryanani
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:27 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Bruhathkayosaurus matleyi?
> How probable are the weight estimates for Bruhathkayosaurus? The old ones
> (175-220 tons), and the new ones (157 tons), both seem a tad heavy for a
> land animal. The lower one puts it in the range of the heaviest Blue Whale
> (160-180 tons), and the higher one far exceeds it. In my humble opinion, a
> land animal would be completely unable to support such a weight. A creature
> like this would be unbale to survive beyond childhood. How true is this?
I don't know: how massive are trees?
Seriously, the hypothesis that this is no more than petrified wood has not been
falsified yet to my satisfaction. A detailed
photograph, and even better a micrograph, would go a long way towards
demonstrating that this was something closer to
_Argentinosaurus_ than to _Araucaria_.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796