[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Tree trunks (was RE: Bruhathkayosaurus matelyi?)
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Tim Williams
> Rahul Daryanani wrote:
> >I think you've made your point, Mr. Taylor. I really wouldn't blame someone
> >for mistaking this thing for a tree-trunk.
> I would if they were claiming to be a paleontologist. The original
> description is atrocious, as Mike said.
To be fair: not all units are the Dinosaur Park or the Djadokhta. In some
preservation is really, really, really crappy. You might
get all sorts of authigenic growth on the fossils, or alteration of the
original material. In outcrops like that, it isn't out of
the question to be fooled into thinking bone is wood and vice versa, especially
from simple surficial appearances. This is why a
section of the fossil would help resolve if it is bone or wood.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796