[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New reference, dinosaur polyphyly based on track record
On 11/21/06, Mark Van Tomme <email@example.com> wrote:
THULBORN, T., 29.9.2006. On the tracks of the earliest
dinosaurs: implications for the hypothesis of
dinosaurian monophyly. Alcheringa 30, 273-311.
>From the record of dinosaurian skeletal remains it has
been inferred that the origin and initial
diversification of dinosaurs were rapid events,
occupying an interval of about 5 million years in the
This scenario of dinosaurian polyphyly is as well-supported by fossil
evidence as is the currently favoured view of
Why footprints must be more informative than skeletal remains?