[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: *Dashanpusaurus dongi*
Evelyn Sobielski wrote:
> Should this be considered published for ICZN purposes...?
Can you mail-order it? Is it peer-reviewed? If so, well, "The Dinosaur
Museum Journal" is >apparently a valid publication according to §8 ICZN:
Peer review is not essential in order for a name to be deemed valid. It
would be helpful if this were the case, but it isn't.
(Especially Chapter 3, Articles 8 and 9.)
What counts, also, is whether the new name is accompanied by a satisfactory
description, including the designation of a type. Otherwise the name is a
nomen nudum. I haven't seen the _Dashanpusaurus_ description, so I don't
Share your latest news with your friends with the Windows Live Spaces