[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> >Hesperornithids, penguins, plotopterids, and
> >mancalline auks, Pinguinus and Chendytes as
> >cases. Did I forget any?
> Apparently by "marine" you mean "flightless" (in
> which case the flightless
> cormorant and steamer ducks might classify as
> borderline cases).
Flightlessness is the one final shackle, so to speak.
I found it awkward enough when writing it. I mean
"marine" in the most basis sense: having the ocean
waters as main habitat and utilizing dry land only to
breed, out of necessity, and even then only the very
shoreline (except some modern penguins).
> >So what one can say with certainty is that there
> >no truly carnivorous lineages of truly marine birds
> >(as opposed to flying seabirds) around when and
> >there was a large diversity of marine mammals.
> Do you consider penguins not truly marine or
Borderline as per coexistence with marine mammals,
especially the large species (smaller species are
meso-/microcarnivores - as was Chendytes). More
widespread equatorwards and commonly much larger until
the Pliocene. Modern pylogenies suggest that Antarcica
proper was resettled post-Pliocene.
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
- RE: Sheesh
- From: Tommy Tyrberg <firstname.lastname@example.org>