[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> Of course, the fact that we have no evidence of aquatic or
> mole-like dinosaurs cannot be explained by the fact that we have
> just not discovered any representative fossils, can it?
It's always possible, but since marine animals generally have better
preservation potential than terrestrial, it seems unlikely. We've
found enough ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, nothosaurs and mosasaurs by
now that it's hard to believe a robust clade of aquatic NON-AVIAN
dinosaurs would have remained undetected till now.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <email@example.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Any problem in computer science can be solved with another
layer of indirection" -- David Wheeler, chief programmer for
the EDSAC project in the early '50s.