[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
>This sounds like a philosopher writing in clouded ways about
Sheldrake's "morphogenetic field". (The mention of "classical
literature" clearly argues against this, but what literature is there
that uses that term? ~:-| )
Again, their conception of morphogenetic fields is quite distinct from
Sheldrake, and the term has been around quite a while.
Even a cursory glance at the book would clear up most of the above, but
I realize that those who posture as skeptics can seldom be expected to
examine things first hand.