[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Essentialism and such (was a bunch of previous subject lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl" <Carl@dondwiggins.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:18 PM
Again, their conception of morphogenetic fields is quite distinct from
Sheldrake, and the term has been around quite a while.
Even a cursory glance at the book would clear up most of the above,
Then please explain this, on- or offlist. You're right I haven't read the
book; two university studies don't leave me enough time. I have barely
started reading the 3rd supplement of Glut's encyclopedia, and still not
finished Mesozoic Vertebrate Life or the Jehol Biota book with the large
<drool> photos I bought at the congress in summer -- and then I'm supposed
to read a philosophical book in the typical boring style* first?
* Judging from the quotes you kindly provided. But I don't see a reason to
expect the rest to be different.