[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: List User-related request

Roberto Takata wrote:

There is some misunderstanding here.

Yes, we're talking past each other -- but I think we're actually in agreement.

[... snip ...]

Agreed anyway...

Falsificationism without verisimilitude could not allow us to think
that we progressively (and asymptotically) approach to THE truth as we
refine our scientific work.

True enough :-) -- but here's the line I was reacting to:

"I thought science was about falsifiable hypothesis and religion was about truth"

Now if we take "falsifiable hypotheses" to mean falsificationism (maybe an unjustified leap), then the sentence implies that you can simply chuck out the notion of truth and replace it with falsificationism. Which I think we'd both agree is problematic.


John Conway - palaeontographer