[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: List User-related request
I didn't intend to start a thread about this. My
message was a request to help me in dino-related
endeavors, but the semantic discussion it's evoking is
--- John Conway <email@example.com> wrote:
> Roberto Takata wrote:
> > There is some misunderstanding here.
> Yes, we're talking past each other -- but I think
> we're actually in
> > [... snip ...]
> Agreed anyway...
> > Falsificationism without verisimilitude could not
> allow us to think
> > that we progressively (and asymptotically)
> approach to THE truth as we
> > refine our scientific work.
> True enough :-) -- but here's the line I was
> reacting to:
> "I thought science was about falsifiable hypothesis
> and religion was
> about truth"
> Now if we take "falsifiable hypotheses" to mean
> falsificationism (maybe
> an unjustified leap), then the sentence implies that
> you can simply
> chuck out the notion of truth and replace it with
> Which I think we'd both agree is problematic.
> John Conway - palaeontographer