[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> Robert J. Schenck
> Mr. Rey
> thought the Dial WAIR model was more widely
> accepted and I definitively accept that model
> much more than any of the others."
> But the WAIR model is built upon two feathered
> forelimgs, giving the organism a 'hold' to the
> slopping/vertical running surfaces.
> Is there are variation of WAIR that invovles the
> leg feathers/leg wing?
Not as yet.
> If WAIR is the activity
> that most leads to flight in the evolution of
> birds, it requires that the legs be powerfully
> developed and devoted to running no?
Much as they are ancestrally, yes, yes it would. I.e., it requires them to
have theropod legs. Which they do.
> variations away from that, while still in the
> "WAIR Stage" would be deleterious to the organism
> no, it would interfere with WAIR no?
No. They wouldn't. I really wish people would get over this idea!!! (Colleagues
They would presumably interfere with the rapid flexion and extension of the
hindlimb much the way that the longer flight feathers of
modern birds prevent the rapid opening and closure of wings: i.e., not at all!
> Perhaps, of
> course, hindlimbs with flight feathers evolved
> after the "WAIR stage" of course.
> Plus, you should probably hope that Mr. Longrich
> is wrong no? YOu'll have to redo all those
> fascinating paintings, adding wing-legs!
Oh, he's woking on that!!
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
Building 237, Room 1117
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: email@example.com
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796
- From: Luis Rey <firstname.lastname@example.org>