[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Coracoid/scapula (was Re: flying Archie)
If they go flightless, do they always lose the joint?
----- Original Message ----
From: David Marjanovic <email@example.com>
To: DML <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:44:18 PM
Subject: Re: Coracoid/scapula (was Re: flying Archie)
>>It would require two more reversals -- in *Sapeornis* and in
>>Confuciusornithidae. Four reversals instead of two or maybe three
> The condition is unknown in _Sapeornis_ and confuciusornithids because the
> suturing/fusion obliterates the nature of the articulation. Thus, they
> could have evolved from birds with the enantiornithean-style
> articulation, and the immobile joint could be secondary. Under this
> scenario, the condition in _Sapeornis_ and confuciusornithids is not a
> reversal. It would be (and has been) coded as '?'.
Ah, then we aren't talking of exactly the same character. I am talking of
the joint, which I interpret as having 3 possible states: flat
(plesiomorphic), coracoid in scapula, or scapula in coracoid. I may be wrong
in which of these is the plesiomorphy, but the reversals I mentioned all
require independent losses of the joint.
Neornithes never lose the joint, BTW, unless they lose the ability to fly.