[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Vote on the Definition of "Aves"
On 9/29/06, Roberto Takata <email@example.com> wrote:
On 9/29/06, T. Michael Keesey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> TOTAL GROUP:
> - Ax 1987 (I don't have the exact wording, but it would be equivalent
> to something like, "Extant birds and everything sharing more recent
> ancestry with them than with any other extant organism." Under this
> definition, dinosaurs would be a type of avian, not vice versa.)
What happen if we eliminate crocs and akins (and turtles, tortoises
and terrapins) - Crocodylia or Loricata?
I'm not sure I understand the question. "Loricata" has been used for
several groups (including crocodylians) but is now generally used for
armadillos, I think. Eliminate them from what?
> APOMORPHY-BASED CLADE:
> - Actually, I don't know if this has been published, but I know there
> are people who think it should be apomorphy-based.
The clade stemming from the first vertebrate to evolve fligth feathers
Benton MJ 2000 - Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is
Linnaeus dead? Bio. Rev. 75: 633-48.
T. Michael Keesey
The Dinosauricon: http://dino.lm.com
Parry & Carney: http://parryandcarney.com