[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaurs and birds
Is the non-flying _Archaeopteryx_ idea still around? <<
It had sure better be. Outside of the assymetrical feathers (which is
a drag-reducing adaptation, not a lift-generating one, although the two
are related) there isn't any terribly good reason to assume
Archaeopteryx was volant. It _may_ have been, but it would have to get
around the glenoid not being oriented for completel upstrokes, the lack
of an ossified sternum for hypertrophied musculature attachment, the
lack of a pulley-like supracoracoideus needed to prevent dislocation of
the humerus during downstrokes, and some problems with the wings
(you'll hear more around SVP time).
The assumption that Archaeopteryx was volant has been grandfathered in
for nearly a century and a half because we all "knew" it was the
"first" bird, so heck, it must have flown. It has never been properly
tested, and frankly, comments like these continue to foster the idea
that it doesn't need testing.
Wyoming Dinosaur Center
110 Carter Ranch Rd.
Thermopolis, WY 82443
(800) 455-3466 ext. 230
Cell: (307) 921-8333
Is the non-flying _Archaeopteryx_ idea still around?Â
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.