[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaurs and birds
Michael Habib wrote:
If the animal is running on a level substrate, then producing a lift force
is usually not particularly helpful, and can actually be counter-productive
under some scenarios (as would probably be the case for basal birds).
Would a lift-force when running on a level substrate be useful for a
pre-avian stage? For example, would it be useful to a small theropod that
was chasing flying insects and trying to snatch them with its jaws? I'm
thinking of the 'ground-up' model of Caple et al. (1983), under which a
cursorial "pro-avian" biped uses its forelimbs (incipient wings) as an
airfoil for balance and stabilization during brief leaps into the air.
Caple, G., Balda, R.P., Willis, W.R. (1983). The physics of leaping animals
and the evolution of preflight. American Naturalist 121: 455-476.
I agree that WAIR would only be useful in trunk-climbing in a bird that
already has a fairly powerful flight apparatus. Probably beyond the
Jeff Hecht wrote:
This may be more relevant to Microraptor than Archaeopteryx, but a while
back somebody pointed out to me that climbing up a tree can be much easier
than getting back down. Just ask anyone who's had to rescue a cat.
Some gliding mammals can climb up trees quite well, although they are not
particularly good at negotatiating branches, and never have need to climb
down courtesy of their gliding adaptations. The Japanese flying squirrel
(_Petaurista leucogenys_) is a good example: its stiff fingers and toes make
it very ungainly in the tree-trops, but it climbs up trunks extremely well.
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office