[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: The New Papers Before Christmas



David Marjanovic writes:

Thus, this test provides no support for a possible role of
ionizing radiation in the K-T extinction event.

For that, they'd need a lot of material from a very short timespan...

[Speculation mode initiated]


I'd think the most damaging effects of an increase in ionizing radiation would be to embryos in non-buried eggs, rather than to adult animals. Crocs, lizards and turtles tend to be egg buriers, and small pregnant mammals may have avoided any possible radiation increases if they were nocturnal burrowers. Dinosaurs that only half-buried their eggs, or relied entirely on direct incubation (leaving them exposed when mum wasn't around), may have experienced higher egg mortality rates if ionizing radiation had increased. Tree- or burrow-nesting birds may have fared better.

[Speculation mode ended]

___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist              geo cities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia             heretichides.soffiles.com
___________________________________________________________________