[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: The Water Horse
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Anthony Docimo wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:30:04 +0000> From: firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: The Water Horse> To: email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org> > I think, if anything, it's based on Nessiteras>
rhombopteryx, which is basically a murky splodge on a> photo that the
authors of that description claim might> be the Loch Ness Monster. > >
AFAIK, no plesiosaur had horns, but just watch as I'm> proven wrong...
could it have been a (spongy?) non-fossilizing material that gives the
appearance of horns?
This dredged up an old memory:
I thot it had little horns, but they were just eyelashes.