[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Did pterosaurs feed by skimming?

although Thalassodromeus and Tupuxuara score points for being more flexible than most. Long-necked azhdarchids, by contrast, would've snapped their necks the moment they skimmed anything with more resistance than snot, and that's probably enough to shoot their skimming prospects down on its own.<

Physical manipulation of the skeleton of the quetz neck shows that it has enough ventral mobility to allow the jaw to tuck under and aft if an object is struck. This will also sweep the wings slightly forward and the cg slightly aft, lifting the snout clear of the water. And, you can see most objects in the water in time to avoid them anyway. I've spent several hundred hours doing low level search and rescue flying in a Piper J3 on the Mississippi and White Rivers in the southern USA. Even though the lower Mississippi is quite muddy, while flying the J3 at altitudes of about a half meter (eye height about 2 meters) you can see most floating objects ahead. Visibility for submerged objects is better at altitude. If you look before you dive (as I would expect anyone to do, even a pterosaur), you know ahead of time which paths to avoid.

Colin McHenry, John Conway, Margot Gerritsen, and I have given several talks about the feasibility for some crested pterosaurs to use a process I call sailglide skimming to use wind for powering a skimming process with a non-rynchopian beak. For the particular example we looked at, it turned out to be feasible in mean annual windfields on the order of 7 knots. By way of comparison and perhaps coincidence, the US Navy has estimated the mean annual windfield over the WIS during the appropriate period to be on the order of 7 knots.

I think we should keep in mind that there may be more than one way to skin a cat and a pterosaur :-)