[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: late night thoughts: misunderstand what?
"Their teeth and their skull biomechanics. Tyrannosaurs look more like
they took time to place a bite in a convenient position and then
thoroughly crunched their prey..."
What is your interpretation of the apparently healed bite marks in the
tail of Edmontosaurus and the illium of Triceratops - don't these
suggest that Tyrannosaurus could grapple something and run? OK maybe
it was the Edmontosaurus doing the running in the first instance, but
I do know that if I'd just bitten the back end of a live Triceratops I
wouldn't want to still be there when its front end turned around.
On 6/14/07, David Marjanovic <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
(While we're mentioning "late-night thoughts"... I was asked if I'd mind
explaining, and I answered "sure". That's not what I meant, obviously.)
> > Tyrannosaurids don't look at all like specialized
> > sauropod-hunters. From such an animal I'd expect the ability to
> > make huge wounds in a short time and then retreat. This is what
> > carnosaurs, especially carcharodontosaurids, look
> > like. Tyrannosaurs were pursuit-and-bite predators.
> That's an interesting perspective. What features of allosauroids make
> them more suited for wound-and-retreat than tyrannosaurs?
Their teeth and their skull biomechanics. Tyrannosaurs look more like they
took time to place a bite in a convenient position and then thoroughly
crunched their prey. This should kill or at least immobilize most animals up
to the tyrannosaur's own size pretty quickly and with a high success rate,
but looks like an unnecessary risk when the prey is twice as long and tall
as the predator.
> No arguments here! I wish more of the recentish spate of WWD-like
> dinosaur documentaries would show a theropod getting comprehensively
> splattered by a sauropod. The world needs more of that kind of thing.