[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

The Latest Extinction Study: Dinosaur demise didn't spur species



Study: Dinosaur demise didn't spur species
 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070328/ap_on_sc/mammal_evolution

By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer
Wed Mar 28, 3:46 PM ET
 NEW YORK - The big dinosaur extinction of 65 million years ago didn't
produce a flurry of new species in the ancestry of modern mammals after all,
says a huge study that challenges a long-standing theory.
Scientists who constructed a massive evolutionary family tree for mammals
found no sign of such a burst of new species at that time among the
ancestors of present-day animals.
Only mammals with no modern-day descendants showed that effect.
"I was flabbergasted," said study co-author Ross MacPhee, curator of
vertebrate zoology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.
At the time of the dinosaur demise, mammals were small, ranging in size
between shrews and cats. The long-held view has been that once the dinosaurs
were gone, mammals were suddenly free to exploit new food sources and
habitats, and as a result they produced a burst of new species.
The new study says that happened to some extent, but that the new species
led to evolutionary dead ends. In contrast, no such burst was found for the
ancestors of modern-day mammals like rodents, cats, horses, elephants and
people.
Instead, they showed an initial burst between 100 million about 85 million
years ago, with another between about 55 million and 35 million year ago,
researchers report in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
The timing of that first period of evolutionary development generally agrees
with the conclusions of some previous studies of mammal DNA, which argue for
a much earlier origin of some mammal lineages than the fossil record does.
The second burst had shown up in the fossil record, MacPhee said. But he
said the new study explains why scientists have been unable to find
relatively modern-looking ancestors of the creatures known from that time:
without any evolutionary boost from the dinosaur demise, those ancestors
were still relatively primitive.
Some experts praised the large scale of the new evolutionary tree, which
used a controversial "supertree" method to combine data covering the vast
majority of mammal species. It challenges paleontologists to find new
fossils that can shed light on mammal history, said Greg Wilson, curator of
vertebrate paleontology at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
William J. Murphy of Texas A&M University, who is working on a similar
project, said no previous analysis had included so many mammal species.
But, "I don't think this is the final word," he said.
The study's approach for assigning dates was relatively crude, he said, and
some dates it produced for particular lineages disagree with those obtained
by more updated methods.
So as for its interpretation of what happened when the dinosaurs died off,
"I'm not sure that conclusion is well-founded," Murphy said.
John Gittleman, a study co-author and director of the University of Georgia
Institute of Ecology, said the researchers considered a range of previously
reported dates for when various lineages split. They found the overall
conclusions of the study were not significantly affected by which dates they
chose, he said.
Researchers should now look at such things as the rise of flowering plants
and a cooling of the worldwide climate to explain why ancestors of
present-day mammals took off before the dinosaurs died out, Gittleman said.
The cause of the later boom is also a mystery, he said.
The study's family tree includes 4,510 species, more than 99 percent of
mammal species covered by an authoritative listing published in 1993.
(Nearly 300 species have since been added to the listing, but the
researchers said that doesn't affect their study's conclusions.) To
construct it, the researchers combined previously published work that relied
on analysis of DNA, fossils, anatomy and other information.
S. Blair Hedges, an evolutionary biologist at Pennsylvania State University,
said the new work "pushes the envelope in the methods and data, and that's
really important."
He said the demise of the dinosaurs may have affected mammal evolution by
influencing characteristics like body size rather than boosting the number
of new species created. Such changes wouldn't be picked up by the new study,
he noted.

On the Net:   Nature: http://www.nature.com/nature


Patti Kane-Vanni
Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004-3012
pkv1@erols.com <mailto:pkv1@erols.com>  or paleopatti@hotmail.com
<mailto:paleopatti@hotmail.com>
http://groups.msn.com/DinosaurandFossilDigs
<http://groups.msn.com/DinosaurandFossilDigs>

"Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions.  Small people
always do that, but really great ones make you feel that you too, can become
great." - Mark Twain