[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Qld Museum to unveil Australia's biggest dinosaur bones
Mike Taylor wrote:
... but the news reports of this beast say that the femur is 1.8m and
the humerus "only" 1.5m, which is rather different from the
proportions expected in a brachiosaurid, so I am pretty confident that
the new Australian specimens are titanosaurians, i.e. members of the
clade (_Saltasaurus_ not _Brachiosaurus_).
Like a lot of situations, this depends upon the exact definition of
Titanosauria. (All this is nothing new to Mike, of course. ;-) )
The earliest definition of Titanosauria is that of Salgado et al. (1997),
who give it a node-based definition based on _Andesaurus_. This was
essentially followed by Wilson and Upchurch (2003), who use both
_Andesaurus_ and _Saltasaurus_ to anchor this clade. The definition given
by Mike (_Saltasaurus_ not _Brachiosaurus_) is stem-based, and is the one
used by Upchurch et al. (2004). Other stem-based definitions also throw in
_Euhelopus_ as a second external specifier. Given just how unstable
_Euhelopus_ is in sauropod phylogeny, and how poorly known _Andesaurus_ is
at the moment, the stem-based "(_Saltasaurus_ not _Brachiosaurus_)" is
probably the most workable definition.
So these new sauropods might be a titanosaur under one definition, but not
under another. Ditto for _Austrosaurus_.
Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN In
Concert today. http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline