[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The Papers That Ate Cincinnati
Mike Keesey wrote:
Presumably the panclade name would be _Pan-Opisthocomus_ or
pan-Opisthocomus or something along those lines. It would be
permissible, e.g., to define _Opisthocomus_ as "_Opisthocomus hoazin_ and
all of its descendants".
Wouldn't this be a tautology?
Alternately, you could use _Opisthocomiformes_ for the total group.
Yep, this is my favourite option. Trouble is, like I said, as well as
having _Opisthocomus hoazin_ as the internal specifier, you would have an
extremely long list of external specifiers. You would probably need a
representative of almost every other extant neognath 'order' as an external
specifier, to cater for any and all topologies of modern bird phylogeny.
Not a bad idea, either. (With the character of manual unguals in
juveniles, perhaps? Or digestion by fermentation in the crop?)
If I was forced to use apomorphy-based definitions, I'd probably favour
something more osteological, to allow for the inclusion of fossil taxa.
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.