[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: The Papers That Ate Cincinnati

From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
On 5/6/07, Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com> wrote:

way. For example, what would happen if the hoatzin is suddenly found to be
nested inside another bird 'order' (like Cuculiformes)?

I think that's absolutely fine. In mammals, _Cetacea_ is part of _Artiodactyla_. In insects, _Isoptera_ is part of _Dictyoptera_ and _Siphonaptera_ is part of _Mecoptera_. If opisthocomiforms are cuculiforms, great. We've learned something new and the nomenclature can help communicate that.

So...the nomenclature would change?

There are still people who don't call Brontosaurus by its proper name of Apatasaurus........what're we going to do when a species has a *dozen* scientific names?

From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
On 5/6/07, Anthony Docimo <keenir@hotmail.com> wrote:

Ahh, okay; so PhyloCode says which species are in groups together.

No, the PhyloCode says nothing about the relationships of species. That's the work of science, not of nomenclature.

Then what's the role/purpose of nomenclature?

(Megalosaurus, (Silesaurus, (Hylaeosaurus, Iguanodon)))

The PhyloCode's job is not to tell us the phylogenetic position of

and what's going to tell us that? *is curious* I've heard talk of scrapping Linnaean classifications.

Cladograms, yes.

that's the word, yes. thank you.

(Incidentally, "mammal-like reptiles" are often not considered
reptiles any more. A better, more succinct term would be

I thought there was a difference between "stem mammals" and "mammal-like reptiles"...one can be the other, but not vice versa. (like cacti and succulents)

Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01