[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Classification: A Definition
On 5/9/07, Anthony Docimo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
actually, that wasn't what I was asking....I was reminded that not all
egg-laying mammals could be classed as monotremes -- so I asked if they
could be classed as synapsids. (as just calling them "mammals" would just
confuse some kids)
All mammals are synapsids (self included), not just the egg-laying ones.
The proper term for "egg-laying mammals" is ... "egg-laying mammals".
(Or "oviparous mammals", if you prefer.)
Curiously, there is no apomorphy-based clade for live-bearing mammals,
but if there were (e.g., "Vivipara"), you could used that to refer to
egg-laying mammals as well ("non-viviparan mammals"). ("Non-therian
mammal" comes close, but would include some extinct live-bearing