[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Cope's Rule in the Pterosauria - Hone & Benton 2007
Mark Witton wrote:
"most later [pterosaurs] were probably coastal fish-eaters"
(Hitting head against wall) - really, what is the deal with this idea? 100
years ago, the analogy of pterosaurs as Mesozoic shorebird equivalents
would've stood up, but nowadays, with greater knowledge of pterosaur
diversity, it just doesn't. I admit, all the direct evidence of pterosaur
dietary preference indicates a fishy diet (e.g. Rhamphorhynchus,
Eudimorphodon, Pteranodon, possibly Pterodactylus), but there are
compelling anatomical and taphonomic reasons to think that many pterosaurs,
including many from the Late Cretaceous, were not flapping around
shorelines catching fish.
Yes, this is what I was driving at. The idea that pterosaurs were mostly
coastal fish-eaters has become as entrenched as the idea that Mesozoic birds
were predominantly insect-eaters. Yet, many Mesozoic avians show
adaptations and/or abdominal contents consistent with fish-eating, or at
least an aquatic/marine habit.
Also, members of the pterosaur family Anurognathidae (_Anurognathus_,
_Batrachognathus_, _Dendrorhynchoides_, _Jeholopterus_) had a morphology
consistent with catching insects 'on the wing' - big eyes, wide mouths, and
perhaps wings and tail adapted for slow, maneuverable flight.
Nick Pharris wrote:
> "...Further, there was always a substantial size gap between the largest
birds and the smallest > birds at any time. The suggestion that birds
somehow drove the pterosaurs towards large size, > and perhaps to final
extinction, is currently not supported."
That should read "a substantial size gap between the largest birds and the
smallest *pterosaurs*," right?
The paper says "largest birds and the smallest birds", so it's possibly a
More photos, more messages, more storage?get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail.