[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: ...intriguing theory on WHAT REALLY KILLED THE DINOSAURS
Forget about it, the guy doesn't know what he's talking about (...and what's
worse, he clearly doesn't know _that_ he doesn't know what he's talking
about). For example, "the shift from gymnosperms to angiosperms" happened 40
million years earlier than he claims. Also, cyclostratigraphy shows that the
Milankovic cycles (of the tilting of the Earth's axis and other stuff)
started much longer ago... I know of terminal Permian evidence for
Sorry but I have just got in from the pub, but surely the KT story is of
continental drift, massive volcanism and the KT impact.
What continental drift? Nothing spectacular at all happened at that time. No
birth or death of an ocean, no first or last contact between continents,
There is no silver bullet.
No, but there is _the bomb_.
A few equations for you:
volume of a sphere = (4*pi*r^3)/3
r = 5 to 6 km
mass = volume x density
average density of rock... look it up
kinetic energy = (m*v^2)/2 -- that's right, half the mass times _the square
velocity of something that drops from the sky... thousands of km per second
Do the math, and then remember all that kinetic energy turns to heat upon