[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The island rule: made to be broken?
I think they missed a group (clade?) that may be
paricularly relevant to dinosaurs. Pygmy elephants
are well-known from the islands off California and, if
memory is correct, from Mediterranean islands.
--- Tim Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
> This is plausibly relevant to dinosaurs, given that
> the issue of insular dwarfism has come up for
> European dinosaurs (e.g., _Europasasaurus_,
> _Magyarosaurus_, _Telmatosaurus_, _Struthiosaurus_).
> This new Proc. R. Soc. B. paper says that the
> "island rule" is actually quite shaky. (For
> mammals, anyway.)
> Shai Meiri, Natalie Cooper & Andy Purvis (2007).
> The island rule: made to be broken? Proceedings of
> The Royal Society B. FirstCite Early Online
> Abstract: "The island rule is a hypothesis whereby
> small mammals evolve larger size on islands while
> large insular mammals dwarf. The rule is believed to
> emanate from small mammals growing larger to control
> more resources and enhance metabolic efficiency,
> while large mammals evolve smaller size to reduce
> resource requirements and increase reproductive
> output. We show that there is no evidence for the
> existence of the island rule when phylogenetic
> comparative methods are applied to a large,
> high-quality dataset. Rather, there are just a few
> clade-specific patterns: carnivores; heteromyid
> rodents; and artiodactyls typically evolve smaller
> size on islands whereas murid rodents usually grow
> larger. The island rule is probably an artefact of
> comparing distantly related groups showing
> clade-specific responses to insularity. Instead of a
> rule, size evolution on islands is likely to be
> governed by the biotic and abiotic characteristics
> of different islands, the biology of the species in
> question and contingency."
> Windows Live Hotmail and Microsoft Office Outlook ?
> together at last. Get it now.