[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: dracrorex and National Geographic

The article is an essay musing on dinosaurs by a famous 75 yr old novelist, John Updike (b. 1932).
I don't think it is intended as a scientific piece, and I'm sure Updike wrote it before the SVP meetings.

On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Jerry D. Harris wrote:

I just saw this month's National Geographic magazine. Isn't it a tad
embarrassing to see "Dracorex hogswartsia" on the cover, and in the article?:
when "Dracorex" was recently outed (along with "Stygiomoloch") as growth stages
of Pachycephalosaurus (Horner et al, SVP2007): not even mentioned in the
article. I find it pretty surprising that National Geographic would sit so
behind the times like this.

Since it's not a news magazine and therefore isn't really expected to update itself merely days before hitting print, I suspect that _NGM_ gets its articles lined up for future issues several months in advance. Thus, I suspect that the "Bizarre Dinosaurs" article was written and laid out before SVP came around. I know for certain that at least one NG person was at the meeting, but I don't know that said person had any power to change the article after the meeting (if indeed said person saw Horner's talk -- I myself missed it). Maybe the talk wasn't reported. Maybe it was, but the editors said "Too late to change it." Maybe the editors said "We could change it, but that's the kind of thing that would require some discussion and we don't have room for that." Who knows? I agree it would have been nice to have the newest, most up-to-date info in the article, but given the nature of the magazine, I'm not positive that was feasible...just a happenstance of poor timing -- if SVP had been a few months earlier, or the _NGM_ article a few months later, I bet the change would have been in there.