[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: futalognkosaurus 105 ft in *Height*
The picture they ran with the story showed 105 feet as its length; the mistake
was only in the text.
At 4:48 PM -0600 10/16/07, Richard W. Travsky wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Jean-Michel BENOIT wrote:
>> In height?
>> 32 m?
>> What would be the length of a titanosaur of such a height?
>It was a funny error on the part of the BBC web site writers. They meant -
>or at least, I *hope* they meant - length. 105 foot/32m tall would indeed be
>What WOULD be the estimated length of a monster like that?
Jeff Hecht, science & technology writer
525 Auburn St., Auburndale, MA 02466 USA