[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: something's wrong here: Qianosuchus phylogeny
David Marjanovic writes:
> No, my friend. No. The most recent common ancestor of pterosaurs
> and scleromochlids was, by definition, not a scleromochlid. (It
> wasn't a pterosaur either.)
Really? What is the reason for knowing a priori that scleromochlids
could not possibly be paraphyletic with respect to pterosaurs?
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I didn't say 'make it optional but the server can reject the
request if it's omitted', I said the inverse: 'make it mandatory,
but the server can accept it if it's omitted'" -- Ray Denenberg.