[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re:



On 9/16/07, Tim Williams wrote:
> And now _Eocursor_.
>
> According to one recent phylogeny, the "basal ornithischian" category may be
> even broader.  Many taxa that used to be regarded as "hypsilophodont-grade"
> ornithopods (but not _Hypsilophodon_ itself) might in fact be basal
> ornithischians, as non-cerapodan neornithischians.
>
>

Yep, but I was trying to keep it fairly simplified in this matter
using fairly more popular examples.