[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Defining Ornithischia (was Re:)
David Marjanovic writes:
> > So? Witness all the changes in the phylogenetic definition of
> > Theropoda as chronicled at:
> > http://www.taxonsearch.org/dev/taxon_edit.php?tax_id=310&Action=View
> > That doesn't stop any of them from being definitions.
> OK... they are definitions, but none of them is valid because the
> PhyloCode is not yet in effect. So, in a sense, they aren't really
> definitions, only suggestions for definitions. :-)
Well, the world can't wait until the PhyloCode is ready -- especially
given the glacial-seeming progress on the Companion Volume(*).
... which I take to be a cue to remind everyone that there is a nice,
short, readable paper on how to interpret pre-PhyloCode phylogenetic
definitions, and it is freely available at:
(*) Side issue: maybe they should just go ahead and implement the
code, and let the companion volume come when it's ready. Or maybe
they should just impose a hard deadline for CV contributions and say
"if it's not in by 31st December, it misses the cut".
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Where's the Cheesecloth?" -- Steven Sondheim, "So Happy"