[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids
Yeah, I had sort of assumed that the "positively misleading" methods were
excluded from Mike's list of choices ...
----- Original Message ----
From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:14:18 AM
Subject: RE: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids
> From: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu [mailto:owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu]
> On Behalf Of don ohmes
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:12 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Anatomical directions for decribing coracoids
> Asking as a dedicated retroactivist; is it useful to go w/ priority?
Not if it is positively misleading compared to the orientation of the
coracoid (that being the real source of the confusion).
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
Faculty Director, Earth, Life & Time Program, College Park Scholars
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA