[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On 9/25/07, Tim Williams <email@example.com> wrote:
> Brandon Pilcher wrote:
> > As to feathers, the chance of them being on a theropod this basal is
> > very slim- osteoderms are present on more derived theropods. Unless
> > you're George Olshevsky.
> "BCF" is a crock (tree-dwelling sauropods, flying tyrannosaurs, etc), but the
> idea of Late Triassic theropods such as _Coelophysis_ being feathered is much
> more plausible. Further, the idea that basal neotheropods (or theropods)
> possessed a feather-like body covering is a testable phylogenetic hypothesis;
> BCF is not (at least not in its current form).
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?